Validity and Reliability of Champion’s Health Belief Model Scale to Measure Beliefs in Breast Self-Examination Practices in Vietnamese Women

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Apr 5, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmscrs/v3-i4-04
Keywords:
Health belief model Scale, reliability, validity, Vietnamese.

Main Article Content

Hang Thi Nguyen
PhD candidate at Nam Dinh University of Nursing, Nam Dinh city, Nam Dinh 420000, VietnamLecturer at Hai Duong Medical Technical University, Hai Duong city, Hai Duong 170000, Vietnam
Tung Thanh Le, Prof.
Chair of committee, Nam Dinh University of Nursing, Nam Dinh city, Nam Dinh 420000, Vietnam
Viet Van Tran, Prof
Lecturer at Hai Duong Medical Technical University, Hai Duong city, Hai Duong 170000, Vietnam
Nga Thi Nguyen, PhD
PhD candidate at Nam Dinh University of Nursing, Nam Dinh city, Nam Dinh 420000, VietnamLecturer at Hai Duong Medical Technical University, Hai Duong city, Hai Duong 170000, Vietnam
Huong Truong Thi Thu
Lecturer at Hai Duong Medical Technical University, Hai Duong city, Hai Duong 170000, Vietnam
Hai Thi Vu , Ms
Lecturer at Hai Duong Medical Technical University, Hai Duong city, Hai Duong 170000, Vietnam

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to translate, adjust and evaluate the validity and reliability of the Champion's Health Belief Model scale, so as to measure the beliefs of self-examination practices of Vietnamese women.


Material and Methods: The adaptation and psychometric characteristics test of the Vietnamese HBM scale was performed, with 40 participants, from October 2021 to June 2022. Of these, 10 women were initially randomized to adjust the translation version, and 30 women were to evaluate the reliability of the scale. The content value of the scale is measured by the opinion of 5 experts. Reliability was measured by Cronbach's alpha, while An estimation of stability is commonly assessed by a test–retest reliability analysis (ICC).


Result: The Vietnamese version of the Health Belief Model scale (V-HBMS) demonstrated good content validity, with the Items content validity index (I-CVI) score for all 42 items> 0.79. Internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha ranges from .715 to .954 and the reliability of the ICC re-test ranged from .954-.000 (p-value = 0.000) determined with good results.


Conclusion: The Vietnamese version of the Health Belief Model scale can be considered a valid tool to survey the belief of Vietnamese women in the implementation of breast self-examination behavior.

Article Details

How to Cite
Nguyen, H. T. ., Le, Prof., T. T., Prof, V. V. T. ., Nguyen, PhD, N. T., Thi Thu, H. T. ., & , Ms, H. T. V. (2023). Validity and Reliability of Champion’s Health Belief Model Scale to Measure Beliefs in Breast Self-Examination Practices in Vietnamese Women. International Journal of Medical Science and Clinical Research Studies, 3(4), 612–620. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmscrs/v3-i4-04
Issue
Vol. 3 No. 4 (2023): Volume 03 Issue 04 April 2023
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

I. WHO. Breast cancer. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/breast-cancer (accessed 2021-12-01).

II. Ministry of Health. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer. 2020.

III. Tran Q. M.; Tran V. T. communication on cancer prevention, Materials for students; Hanoi Medical Publishing House, 2015.

IV. Trần Quang Mai T. V. T. Truyền thông phòng chống ung thư, Tài liệu dành cho học viên. 2015.

V. Kissal, A.; Kartal, B. Effects of Health Belief Model-Based Education on Health Beliefs and Breast Self-Examination in Nursing Students. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs 2019, 6 (4), 403. https://doi.org/10.4103/apjon.apjon_17_19.

VI. Moey, S.-F.; Mohamed, N. C.; Lim, B.-C. A Path Analytic Model of Health Beliefs on the Behavioral Adoption of Breast Self-Examination. AIMS Public Health 2020, 8 (1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.3934/publichealth.2021002.

VII. Smith, R. A.; Brooks, D.; Cokkinides, V.; Saslow, D.; Brawley, O. W. Cancer Screening in the United States, 2013: A Review of Current American Cancer Society Guidelines, Current Issues in Cancer Screening, and New Guidance on Cervical Cancer Screening and Lung Can. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2013, 63 (2), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21174.

VIII. Tuyen, D. Q.; Dung, T. V.; Dong, H. V.; Kien, T. T.; Huong, T. T. Breast Self-Examination: Knowledge and Practice Among Female Textile Workers in Vietnam. Cancer Control 2019, 26 (1), 1073274819862788. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073274819862788.

IX. Võ Thị Ngọc Hà; Trung T. T.; Champion J. D. Research on women’s breast self-examination practice and related factors. 2016, 9.

X. Liu, N.; Wang, J.; Chen, D.-D.; Sun, W.-J.; Zhang, W. Tools for the Assessment of Breast Cancer Screening Beliefs in Women: A Literature Review. J Comp Eff Res 2019, 8 (9), 645–655. https://doi.org/10.2217/cer-2018-0142.

XI. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4th Ed; Glanz, K., Rimer, B. K., Viswanath, K., Series Eds.; Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice, 4th ed; Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA, US, 2008; pp xxxiii, 552.

XII. Champion, V. L. Revised Susceptibility, Benefits, and Barriers Scale for Mammography Screening. Res Nurs Health 1999, 22 (4), 341–348. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1098-240x(199908)22:4<341::aid-nur8>3.0.co;2-p.

XIII. Marmarà, D.; Marmarà, V.; Hubbard, G. Maltese Translation and Adaptation of Champion’s Health Belief Model Scale and the Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire for Breast Screening Among Maltese Women. J Nurs Meas 2017, 25 (3), 486–503. https://doi.org/10.1891/1061-3749.25.3.486.

XIV. Parsa, P.; Kandiah, M.; Mohd Nasir, M. T.; Hejar, A.; Mohd Zulkefli, N. Reliability and Validity of Champion’s Health Belief Model Scale for Breast Cancer Screening among Malaysian Women. Singapore medical journal 2008, 49, 897–903.

XV. Lee, E.-H.; Kim, J.-S.; Song, M. S. Translation and Validation of Champion’s Health Belief Model Scale With Korean Women: Cancer Nursing 2002, 25 (5), 391–395. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002820-200210000-00010.

XVI. Zelviene, A.; Bogusevicius, A. Reliability and Validity of the Champion’s Health Belief Model Scale among Lithuanian Women. Cancer Nursing 2007, 30 (3), E20–E28. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NCC.0000270711.72413.a6.

XVII. Nguyen Vo Tra Mi. Knowledge, attitude and practice of breast self-examination of female students in some high schools in Thua Thien Hue province. jcmhch 2020, No. 65. https://doi.org/10.38103/jcmhch.2020.65.8.

XVIII. Tsang, S.; Royse, C.; Terkawi, A. Guidelines for Developing, Translating, and Validating a Questionnaire in Perioperative and Pain Medicine. Saudi J Anaesth 2017, 11 (5), 80. https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_203_17.

XIX. Champion, V. L. Revised Susceptibility, Benefits, and Barriers Scale for Mammography Screening. 1999, 14.

XX. Cha, E.-S.; Kim, K. H.; Erlen, J. A. Translation of Scales in Cross-Cultural Research: Issues and Techniques. J Adv Nurs 2007, 58 (4), 386–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04242.x.

XXI. Wild, D.; Grove, A.; Martin, M.; Eremenco, S.; McElroy, S.; Verjee-Lorenz, A.; Erikson, P. Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: Report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value in Health 2005, 8 (2), 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x.

XXII. Guillemin, F.; Bombardier, C.; Beaton, D. Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Health-Related Quality of Life Measures: Literature Review and Proposed Guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 1993, 46 (12), 1417–1432. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(93)90142-n.

XXIII. Gözüm, S.; Aydin, ??lknur. Validation Evidence for Turkish Adaptation of Champion??S Health Belief Model Scales: Cancer Nursing 2004, 27 (6), 491???498. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002820-200411000-00009.

XXIV. Lynn, M. R. Determination and Quantification Of Content Validity: Nursing Research 1986, 35 (6), 382???386. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017.

XXV. Davis, L. L. Instrument Review: Getting the Most from a Panel of Experts. Applied Nursing Research 1992, 5 (4), 194–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0897-1897(05)80008-4.

XXVI. Wynd, C. A.; Schmidt, B.; Schaefer, M. A. Two Quantitative Approaches for Estimating Content Validity. West J Nurs Res 2003, 25 (5), 508–518. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945903252998.

XXVII. Zamanzadeh, V.; Ghahramanian, A.; Rassouli, M.; Abbaszadeh, A.; Alavi-Majd, H.; Nikanfar, A.-R. Design and Implementation Content Validity Study: Development of an Instrument for Measuring Patient-Centered Communication. J Caring Sci 2015, 4 (2), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.15171/jcs.2015.017.

XXVIII. Yilmaz, M.; Sayin, Y. Y. Turkish Translation and Adaptation of Champion’s Health Belief Model Scales for Breast Cancer Mammography Screening. J Clin Nurs 2014, 23 (13–14), 1978–1989. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12370.

XXIX. Huaman, M. A.; Kamimura-Nishimura, K. I.; Kanamori, M.; Siu, A.; Lescano, A. G. Validation of a Susceptibility, Benefits, and Barrier Scale for Mammography Screening among Peruvian Women: A Cross-Sectional Study. BMC Womens Health 2011, 11, 54. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-11-54.

XXX. Koo, T. K.; Li, M. Y. A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. J Chiropr Med 2016, 15 (2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012.

XXXI. Moreira, C. B.; Dahinten, V. S.; Howard, A. F.; Fernandes, A. F. C. The Revised Champion’s Health Belief Model Scale: Predictive Validity Among Brazilian Women. SAGE Open Nursing 2020, 6, 237796082094055. https://doi.org/10.1177/2377960820940551.